Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Advocates in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | NI Act Section 148 | Advocate Paresh M Modi

ચેક બાઉંસ કેસના વકીલ અમદાવાદ | 9925002031 | Top Lawyer for Cheque Bounce Cases Ahmedabad | NI Act Section 148


Section 148. power of Appellate Court to order payment pending appeal against conviction

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974), in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under Section 138, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty per cent of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court:

Provided that the amount payable under this sub-section Shall be in addition to any interim compensation paid by the appellant under Section 143-A.

(2) The amount referred to in Sub-Section (1) Shall be deposited within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the appellant.

(3) The Appellate Court may direct the release of the amount deposited by the appellant to the complainant at any time during the pendency of the appeal:

Provided that if the appellant is acquitted, the Court Shall direct the complainant to repay to the appellant the amount so released, with interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, Prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial year, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the complainant.


કલમ-148. ગુના-સાબિતી વિરુધ્ધની અપીલનો નિકાલ બાકી હોય ત્યારે ચુકવણીનો હુકમ કરવાની અપીલ અદાલતની સતા

(1) ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતિ સંહિતા 1973 (સને 1974 નો રજો) માં ગમે તે સમાવિષ્ટ હોય તેમ છતાં, ચેક લખી આપનારે કલમ-138 હેઠળની ગુના-સાબિતી વિરુધ્દ કરેલી અપીલમાં, અપીલ અદાલત, અપીલ કરનારને, સુનાવણી અદાલતે (ટ્રાયલ કોર્ટ) એવોર્ડ કરેલા દંડ અથવા વળતરના ઓછમાં ઓછા 20 ટકા જેટલી રકમ જમા કરાવવાનો હુકમ કરશે.

પરંતુ આ પેટાકલમ હેઠળ ચુકવવાપાત્ર રકમ, અપીલ કરનારને કલમ-143 (ક) હેઠળ ચુકવેલી કોઇ વચગાળાના વળતર ઉપરાંતની રહેશે.

(2) પેટાકલમ-(1) માં જણાવવામાં આવેલી રકમ, હુકમની તારીખથી સાઠ દિવસની અંદર અથવા અપીલ કરનાર દ્રારા પુરતું કારણ દર્શાવવામાં આવ્યેથી અદાલત આદેશ કરે એ મુજબ 30 દિવસથી વધુ નહીં એટલા સમયગાળાની અંદર જમા કરાવવું જોઇશે.

(3) અપીલ અદાલત, અપીલ કરનારને જમા કરાવેલી રકમ અપીલનો નિકાલ બાકી હોય તે દરમિયાન કોઇ પણ સમયે ફરિયાદીને છુટી કરવાનો આદેશ કરી શકશે.

પરંતુ અપીલ કરનારને નિર્દોષ ઠરાવવામાં આવે તો, અદાલત ફરિયાદીને આદેશ કરશે કે તે આ રીતે છુટી કરવામાં આપેલી રકમ સબંધિત નાણાકીય વર્ષના આરંભે પ્રવર્તમાન હોય એટલા ભારતીય રિઝર્વ બેંક દ્રારા પ્રસિદ્ર કરવામાં આવેલા બેંક દરે વ્યાજ સાથે હુકમની તારીખથી સાઠ દિવસની અંદર અથવા ફરિયાદી દ્રારા પુરતું કારણ દર્શાવવામાં આવ્યેથી અદાલત આદેશ કરે એ મુજબ 30 દિવસથી વધુ નહીં એટલા સમયગાળાની અંદર અપીલ કરનારને ચુકવી આપે.


एड्वोकेट परेश एम मोदी Cheque Bounce Cases, NI Act 138 के विशेषज्ञ वकील हैं। चेक रिटर्न मामलों, आपराधिक मामलों, पारिवारिक मामलों और नागरिक मामलों के लिए वह मेरे निकट सबसे अच्छे वकील हैं। Advocate Paresh M Modi अहमदाबाद गांधीनगर नडियाद आनंद बड़ौदा वडोदरा सूरत और गुजरात राज्य के अन्य छोटे शहरों सहित पूरे गुजरात में सबसे अच्छे वकील हैं.

એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ 1881, કલમ 138ના નિષ્ણાત એડવોકેટ છે. તેઓ ચેક રિટર્ન કેસ, ફોજદારી કેસ, કૌટુંબિક બાબતો અને સિવિલ મેટર્સ માટે મારી નજીકના શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ છે. તેઓ અમદાવાદ ગાંધીનગર નડિયાદ આણંદ બરોડા વડોદરા સુરત અને ગુજરાત રાજ્યના અન્ય નાના શહેરો સહિત સમગ્ર ગુજરાતનાં શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ છે,


Advocate Paresh M Modi is Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad having enough experience regarding NI Act 1881. Advocate Paresh M Modi is also the Best Advocate in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Specialist of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, Section 138. He is the Best Lawyer near me for Cheque Return Cases, Criminal Cases, Family Matters and Civil Matters in Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Nadiad, Anand, Baroda, Vadodara, Surat and other Small town of Gujarat State.

For your criminal Case, Bail Matter, Cheque Bounce Case, Family Matters, Property Disputes Cases, Civil Suits, Call or WhatsApp on Mobile No. 9925002031, to Advocate Paresh M Modi, Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Advocate in Ahmedabad


 

Legal Words and Definition



Cheque

A cheque is a negotiable instrument instructing a bank to pay a specific amount from an account holder’s funds to a designated party.


NI Act

The Negotiable Instruments Act governs financial instruments like cheques, including penalties for dishonor due to insufficient funds.


Cheque Return

Cheque return occurs when a bank declines to honor a cheque, often due to insufficient funds or signature mismatch.


Cheque Dishonour

Cheque dishonor happens when a cheque cannot be processed due to insufficient funds, stop payments, or other technical reasons.


Cheque Bounce

Cheque bounce refers to the non-fulfillment of a cheque’s payment, often leading to legal action under the Negotiable Instruments Act.


Plea

A plea is a formal statement made by an accused in court, declaring guilt, innocence, or a defense to charges.


Act

An act is a formal legislative statute passed by Parliament or a state assembly, providing rules, regulations, and procedures governing various matters.


Law

Law is the system of rules and guidelines established by society, enforced through institutions, to regulate conduct and ensure justice.


Section

A section is a distinct part of a legal statute or act, specifying particular rules, provisions, or guidelines within the larger framework of the law.


Jail

Jail is a facility for detaining individuals accused or convicted of crimes, serving as a correctional or pre-trial holding institution.


Magistrates

Magistrates are judicial officers responsible for administering justice in lower courts, handling minor cases, bail matters, and preliminary inquiries.


Judges

Judges preside over courts, interpreting laws, assessing evidence, and delivering judgments to ensure justice is served in legal disputes or cases.


Jamanat

Jamanat refers to bail or security deposited to ensure an accused person’s release from custody while guaranteeing their court appearances.


Complaint

A complaint is a formal legal statement filed by an individual or entity alleging wrongdoing or seeking redress for grievances.


Complainant

The complainant is the person or party who files a legal complaint, initiating proceedings against an accused person or entity.


Accused

An accused is an individual formally charged or suspected of committing a crime, pending trial or investigation to establish guilt or innocence.


Crime

Crime is any act or omission punishable by law, considered harmful to individuals, society, or the state, including theft, fraud, and assault.


Criminal

A criminal is an individual convicted of violating laws, having committed acts deemed punishable under the legal system.


Case

A case is a legal dispute or criminal matter brought before a court for resolution or judgment based on presented evidence and arguments.


Expert

An expert is a person with specialized knowledge or skills in a particular field, often called upon for advice or testimony in legal matters.


Specialist

A specialist is someone highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area of law, offering expert legal counsel or representation.


Top

Top refers to being at the highest rank or level in a given field, often used to describe leading lawyers or advocates with a successful track record.


Best

Best signifies unparalleled quality or excellence, frequently used for legal professionals known for exceptional expertise and success.


Near Me

“Near me” refers to finding local legal services or professionals in proximity for convenient access to legal assistance.


Appeal

An appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review and potentially overturn a lower court’s judgment or order.


Revision

Revision involves reviewing and rectifying procedural or jurisdictional errors in a lower court’s judgment or decision.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Judgement

Judgement:

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- Section 139-Legal Liability of drawer of cheque-Presumtion under Section 139 has not been rebutted, trial Court Wrongly acquitted accused-Viewed that there was no consideration for which cheques were given to complainant-Court confirmed incorrect view, order set aside.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881- કલમ 139- ચેક કાઢી આપનારની કાનુની જવાબદારી- કલમ 139 હેઠળના અનુમાનને ખોટું ઠરાવાયું નથી-ટ્રાયલ કોર્ટે આરોપીને ખોટી રીતે છોડી મુકયો-એવો મત કે ફરિયાદીને ચેકો અપાયા જે માટે કોઇ અવેજ ન હતો-અદાલતે ખોટા અભિપ્રાયને કે મતને કાયમ કર્યો-આદેશ રદ કરવામાં આવ્યો.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 139-Liability or “debt”- Ex-pressions “give” ruising of doubt, liability under Section 138 cannot be avoided if cheque returns unpaid-High Court get carried away by issue of guarantee and guarantor’s liablity has overlooked true intent of section 138.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ 139- “જવાબદારી” અથવા “દેવું”- શબ્દપ્રયોગ શંકા પેદા કરે છે જો ચેક સ્વીકારાયા વિના પરત ફરે તો કલમ ૧૩૮ હેઠળ જવાબદારી ટાળી શકાશે નહિ-ગેંરટી આપવાથી હાઇકોર્ટ સંતોષાઇ ગઇ અને ખાત્રી આપનારની જવાબદારીને ધ્યાનમાં લીધી નથી-કલમ 138 નો ખરો ઇરાદો ધ્યાનમાં લીધો નથી.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 139- Legal liability of drawer-Limited company is a separate legal entity and its directors are different legal persons under Section 139 one can safely conclude that cheques signed had been given to company in discharge of debt or liability incurred by company.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ-139-ચેક કાઢી આપનારની કાનુની જવાબદારી-લિમિટેડ કંપની એ એક અલગ કાનુની વ્યકિતત્વ અને એના ડિરેકટરો કલમ 139 હેઠળ અલગ કાનુની વ્યકિતઓ છે- આથી એમ સલામત રીતે નિષ્કર્ષ કાઢી શકાય કે સહી કરેલો ચેક કંપનીને એના દેણા કે એણે સ્વીકારેલી જવાબદારી પ્રત્યે અપાયો હતો.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- S. 139-The standard of proof in discharge of burden in terms of S. 139, being of preponderance of probability, the inference, therefore, can be drawn not only from the materials brought on record but also from the reference to circumstances upon which the accused relied upon-Burden of proof on the accused is not as high as that of the prosecution.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881- કલમ 139- કલમ 139 ના શબ્દોમાં, બોજાની મુકિતમાં પુરાવાનું ધોરણ, શકયતાની પ્રબળતા હોવાથી રેકર્ડ પર લાવવામાં આવેલ સામગ્રી પરથી જ નહિ, પરંતુ જે સંજોગો પર આરોપીએ આધાર રાખ્યો તે સંજોગોના નિર્દેશ પરથી પણ અનુમાન કરી શકાય છે-આરોપી પર પુરવાનો બોજો ફરીયાદીના જેટલો વધારે નથી.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section 138 Judgement

Section:138 : Comment :

Negotiable Insturments Act, 1881-Complaint u/S. 138-Specifies that all the accused in active connivance mischievously and intentionally issued the cheques in favour of the applellant-No unimpeachable evidence brought on record to indicate that allowing the proceedings to continue would be an abuse of process of the Court-Appeals allowed orders of quashment by the Hon’ble High Court of judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and state of Andhra pradesh is set aside and that of the Trial Court is restored.

ટીપ્પણી:

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881- કલમ 138 હેઠળ ફરિયાદ-સુચવે છે કે તમામ આરોપીઓ સક્રિય સંમતિથી અપરાધપુર્વક અને ઇરાદાપુર્વક અરજદારની તરફેણમાં ચેક જારી કર્યા હતા- કાર્યવાહી ચાલુ રાખવી એ અદાલતની પ્રક્રિયાનો દુરપયોગ સુચવવા માટે કોઇ બિન-તહોમતપત્ર પુરાવા રેકોર્ડ પર લાવાય નથી- તેલાંગણ રાજય અને આંધ્ર પ્રદેશ રાજય માટે હૈદરાબાદમાં ન્યાયિક માનનીય હાઇકોર્ટ દ્રારા આપવામાં આવેલ રદ બાતલનો હુકમ રદ કરવામાં આવે છે અને તેમાં સુનાવણી અદાલતનો હુકમ પુન:સ્થાપિત કરવામાં આવ્યો અને અપીલો મંજુર કરવામાં આવી.

Section:138: Judgement

A.R.Radha Krishna Vs. Dasari Deepthi 2019 (1) G.L.H. 674.

Negotiable Insturuments Act, 1881-S.138-Husband of accused-Secured loan-wife of loanee issued cheque bounced-Statutory notice served-Complaint-Conclusion of trial-Trial Court acquitted accused-No privity of contract is between complainant Bank and husband of accused-Not joined as co-accused-No liability been fastened upon accused-Acquittal confirm-Appeal dismissed.

Section:138: Judgement

A.R.Radha Krishna Vs. Dasari Deepthi 2019 (1) G.L.H. 674.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881- કલમ-૧૩૮- આરોપીનો પતિ-લોન/રૂણ મેળવેલ- લોન લેનારની પત્નીએ આપેલ ચેક પરત ફરેલ -કાયદેસરની નોટીસ આપવામાં આપેલ-ફરિયાદ- સુનાવણીનો અંત- ઇન્સાફી અદાલતે આરોપીને નિર્દોષ છોડેલ- પક્ષકારો વચ્ચે કરાર સંબંધ નથી- ઠરાવ્યું, ફરિયાદી બેંક અને આરોપીના પતિ વચ્ચે કરાર સંબંધ છે-સહાઆરોપી તરીકે જોડાયેલ નથી-આરોપી ઉપર જવાબદારી લાદી શકાય નહિ- નિર્દોષ છોડવાના હુકમ મંજુર કરવા આવ્યો-(અપીલ) નામંજુર કરવામાં આવી.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Section 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds in the account

Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 19 [a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless—

(a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;
(b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, 20 [within thirty days] of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and
(c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.]

138. खाते में धनराशि की अपर्याप्तता, आदि के लिए चेक का अनादर -जहां किसी व्यक्ति द्वारा किसी बैंकर के पास रखे गए खाते पर किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी भी ऋण या अन्य दायित्व के पूर्ण या आंशिक रूप से निर्वहन के लिए भुगतान करने के लिए चेक किया गया चेक है, बैंक द्वारा अवैतनिक लौटाया गया, या तो उस खाते में जमा राशि के कारण चेक का सम्मान करने के लिए अपर्याप्त है या यह उस बैंक के साथ किए गए समझौते द्वारा उस खाते से भुगतान की जाने वाली राशि से अधिक है, ऐसा व्यक्ति करेगा अपराध किया हुआ माना जाएगा और इस अधिनियम के किन्हीं अन्य प्रावधानों पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव डाले बिना, के कारावास से दंडित किया जाएगा [एक अवधि जिसे दो वर्ष तक बढ़ाया जा सकता है, या जुर्माने के साथ जो चेक की राशि से दोगुना हो सकता है, या दोनों के साथ) बशर्ते कि इस धारा में निहित कुछ भी तब तक लागू नहीं होगा जब तक कि-

(ए) चेक बैंक को उस तारीख से छह महीने(अब तीन महीने)की अवधि के भीतर प्रस्तुत किया गया है जिस पर इसे जारी गया है या इसकी वैधता की अवधि के भीतर, जो भी पहले हो;
(बी) भुगतानकर्ता या धारक चेक के उचित समय में जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के आहर्ता को लिखित रूप में नोटिस देकर उक्त राशि के भुगतान की मांग करता है, उसके भीतर बैंक से उसके द्वारा भुगतान न किए गए चेक की वापसी के संबंध में सूचना की प्राप्ति के तीस दिन; तथा
सी) ऐसे चेक का आहर्ता उक्त नोटिस की प्राप्ति के पन्द्रह दिनों के भीतर, भुगतानकर्ता या धारक को, जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के नियत समय में उक्त राशि का भुगतान करने में विफल रहता है।
स्पष्टीकरण.- इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, “ऋण या अन्य दायित्व” का अर्थ कानूनी रूप से प्रवर्तनीय ऋण या अन्य दायित्व है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Understanding Cheque Bounce Cases and the Role of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocate in Ahmedabad | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Cheque Bounce Lawyer:

A Cheque Bounce Lawyer is a legal professional who specializes in Cheque Bounce cases. Cheque Bounce is a criminal offense in India, and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, governs the legal aspects of Cheque Bounce cases. A Cheque Bounce Lawyer can assist you in understanding the legal implications of Cheque Bounce, and the options available to you.

If you are a victim of Cheque Bounce, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you file a Cheque Bounce case against the issuer of the cheque. They can represent you in court proceedings and help you recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

If you have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you defend yourself in court. They can advise you on the legal options available to you and represent you in court proceedings. They can also help you negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

Cheque Bounce cases:

Cheque Bounce cases are initiated by the payee against the issuer of a bounced cheque. The payee must prove that they had a legally enforceable debt or liability against the issuer of the cheque, and that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account or any other reason.

The payee can file a Cheque Bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for criminal liability in case of Cheque Bounce. The case can be filed in the court where the cheque was dishonored or where the payee has a registered office.

If the court finds the issuer guilty of issuing a bounced cheque, they may order them to pay the amount due along with any penalty and interest. The court may also impose imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both.

It’s important to note that Cheque Bounce cases can be time-consuming and expensive, and may require the assistance of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer. Therefore, it’s advisable to take appropriate measures to ensure that cheques issued or received by you are honored by the bank.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a well-known Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. He has extensive experience in handling Cheque Bounce cases and has represented clients in various courts across Gujarat.

Advocate Modi provides legal services related to all aspects of Cheque Bounce cases, including legal consultation, drafting of legal notices, filing of Cheque Bounce cases, and representation in court proceedings. He has a track record of successfully handling Cheque Bounce cases and helping clients recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

Advocate Modi also assists clients who have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque. He provides legal advice and representation in court proceedings, and helps clients negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

If you are facing a Cheque Bounce issue in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and are in need of legal assistance, you can reach out to Advocate Paresh M Modi for expert guidance and representation.