Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Gandhinagar | 9925002031 | NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Gandhinagar

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Gandhinagar | 09925002031

Facing a cheque bounce can be stressful, but with the right legal support, you can navigate the complexities of the situation effectively. Advocate Paresh M Modi, a leading cheque bounce lawyer in Gandhinagar, specializes in providing comprehensive legal solutions to help clients resolve cheque bounce cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act. He is the Top DRT Lawyer, Best Criminal Lawyer, Experience Property Lawyer, Famous SSRD Advocate, Good Family Lawyer, Expert Divorce Lawyer and Specialist of Cheque Bounce Cases in Gujarat.


What is a Cheque Bounce?

A cheque bounce occurs when a bank refuses to honor a cheque due to reasons such as insufficient funds, discrepancies, or closed accounts. Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a bounced cheque can result in both civil and criminal liabilities for the issuer. Taking prompt legal action is essential to protect your rights and recover the owed amount.


Legal Words and Definition



Cheque

A cheque is a negotiable instrument instructing a bank to pay a specific amount from an account holder’s funds to a designated party.


NI Act

The Negotiable Instruments Act governs financial instruments like cheques, including penalties for dishonor due to insufficient funds.


Cheque Return

Cheque return occurs when a bank declines to honor a cheque, often due to insufficient funds or signature mismatch.


Cheque Dishonour

Cheque dishonor happens when a cheque cannot be processed due to insufficient funds, stop payments, or other technical reasons.


Cheque Bounce

Cheque bounce refers to the non-fulfillment of a cheque’s payment, often leading to legal action under the Negotiable Instruments Act.


Plea

A plea is a formal statement made by an accused in court, declaring guilt, innocence, or a defense to charges.


Act

An act is a formal legislative statute passed by Parliament or a state assembly, providing rules, regulations, and procedures governing various matters.


Law

Law is the system of rules and guidelines established by society, enforced through institutions, to regulate conduct and ensure justice.


Section

A section is a distinct part of a legal statute or act, specifying particular rules, provisions, or guidelines within the larger framework of the law.


Jail

Jail is a facility for detaining individuals accused or convicted of crimes, serving as a correctional or pre-trial holding institution.


Magistrates

Magistrates are judicial officers responsible for administering justice in lower courts, handling minor cases, bail matters, and preliminary inquiries.


Judges

Judges preside over courts, interpreting laws, assessing evidence, and delivering judgments to ensure justice is served in legal disputes or cases.


Jamanat

Jamanat refers to bail or security deposited to ensure an accused person’s release from custody while guaranteeing their court appearances.


Complaint

A complaint is a formal legal statement filed by an individual or entity alleging wrongdoing or seeking redress for grievances.


Complainant

The complainant is the person or party who files a legal complaint, initiating proceedings against an accused person or entity.


Accused

An accused is an individual formally charged or suspected of committing a crime, pending trial or investigation to establish guilt or innocence.


Crime

Crime is any act or omission punishable by law, considered harmful to individuals, society, or the state, including theft, fraud, and assault.


Criminal

A criminal is an individual convicted of violating laws, having committed acts deemed punishable under the legal system.


Case

A case is a legal dispute or criminal matter brought before a court for resolution or judgment based on presented evidence and arguments.


Expert

An expert is a person with specialized knowledge or skills in a particular field, often called upon for advice or testimony in legal matters.


Specialist

A specialist is someone highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area of law, offering expert legal counsel or representation.


Top

Top refers to being at the highest rank or level in a given field, often used to describe leading lawyers or advocates with a successful track record.


Best

Best signifies unparalleled quality or excellence, frequently used for legal professionals known for exceptional expertise and success.


Near Me

“Near me” refers to finding local legal services or professionals in proximity for convenient access to legal assistance.


Appeal

An appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review and potentially overturn a lower court’s judgment or order.


Revision

Revision involves reviewing and rectifying procedural or jurisdictional errors in a lower court’s judgment or decision.


Gandhinagar

Gandhinagar, Gujarat’s capital, is home to significant legal and administrative institutions, ensuring efficient justice delivery.


 

Our Legal Services

We offer a wide range of legal services tailored to address cheque bounce cases, including:

  • Legal Consultation: We provide expert legal advice to help you understand the implications of cheque bounce laws and your available options.
  • Issuing Legal Notices: We assist clients in drafting and sending legal notices to the issuer of the bounced cheque, demanding payment within the statutory time frame.
  • Filing Complaints: We help clients file complaints under Section 138 in the Gandhinagar District Court or other relevant courts.
  • Court Representation: Our experienced legal team represents clients in court, ensuring effective advocacy throughout the proceedings.
  • Negotiation and Settlement: We strive for amicable resolutions to avoid prolonged litigation.
Cheque Bounce Lawyer In Ahmedabad

NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Gandhinagar

Advocate Paresh M Modi has extensive experience handling Section 138 cases, where bounced cheques may lead to criminal liability. Our specialized services include:

  • Filing Section 138 Complaints: We guide clients through the process of filing complaints to initiate legal action against the cheque issuer.
  • Defending Against False Claims: If you are wrongly accused of issuing a bounced cheque, we offer a strong defense to protect your interests.
  • Court Proceedings: Our legal team diligently prepares and presents your case in court, advocating for your rights.

Why Choose Advocate Paresh M Modi?

  • Expertise in Cheque Bounce Cases: With extensive experience, Advocate Paresh M Modi effectively manages cheque bounce cases, striving for favorable outcomes for clients.
  • Client-Centric Approach: We prioritize our clients’ needs, offering tailored legal solutions that address their specific situations.
  • Proven Track Record: Our firm has a strong history of successfully resolving cheque bounce cases, helping clients recover their rightful dues.
  • Transparent Communication: We maintain open communication, keeping clients informed about their cases and available legal options.

The Legal Process for Cheque Bounce Cases

  1. Issuance of Legal Notice: Upon a bounced cheque, we issue a legal notice to the drawer, demanding payment within 15 days.
  2. Filing a Complaint: If payment is not made, we file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the appropriate court.
  3. Court Proceedings: Our team represents you in court, presenting evidence and arguments to support your case.
  4. Resolution: The court may rule in favor of the aggrieved party, allowing for the recovery of the cheque amount and potential penalties.

If you are facing a cheque bounce issue or need a NI Act Section 138 case lawyer in Gandhinagar, it’s essential to seek professional legal assistance. Contact Advocate Paresh M Modi today at 09925002031 for a consultation. Let us help you protect your rights and recover your dues effectively.

Questions related to Cheque Bounce Case and Negotiable Instruments Act in India:

  1. What is a cheque bounce case?
    – A cheque bounce case occurs when a cheque presented for payment is dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds or any other reason.
  2. What is the legal recourse available for a bounced cheque?
    – The legal recourse available is to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
  3. What is the punishment for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
    – The punishment includes imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both.
  4. What are the essential elements to prove under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
    – The existence of a legally enforceable debt.
    – Issuance of a cheque towards discharge of debt.
    – Dishonor of the cheque.
    – The recipient of the cheque serving a legal notice demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
    – Failure of the drawer to make the payment within 15 days of receiving the notice.
  5. Is there a time limit for filing a complaint under Section 138?
    – Yes, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises.
  6. Can a cheque bounce case be settled outside of court?
    – Yes, the parties can mutually settle the matter outside of court before or after the filing of a complaint.
  7. What is the procedure for filing a complaint under Section 138?
    – The payee or holder of the cheque must issue a legal notice to the drawer demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
    – If the payment is not made within 15 days of receiving the notice, a complaint can be filed before the appropriate court having jurisdiction.
  8. Can a company file a complaint for a bounced cheque?
    – Yes, a company can file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  9. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque?
    – Yes, a cheque bounce case can be filed against a post-dated cheque if it is dishonored upon presentation.
  10. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation as it lacks consideration.
  11. Is there a provision for compoundable offenses under Section 138?
    – Yes, with the consent of the payee and the court, the offense under Section 138 can be compounded.
  12. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a stale cheque?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed against a stale cheque as it is not legally enforceable.
  13. What is the role of the court in a cheque bounce case?
    – The court examines the evidence presented by both parties and decides whether the offense under Section 138 has been committed.
  14. What defenses can be raised by the drawer in a cheque bounce case?
    – Lack of consideration.
    – Payment already made.
    – Cheque issued as security.
    – Dispute regarding the debt.
  15. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a loan repayment installment?
    – Yes, if the installment cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  16. What is the role of the bank in a cheque bounce case?
    – The bank provides the dishonor memo and other relevant documents to the payee or holder of the cheque, which are essential for filing a complaint.
  17. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to signature mismatch?
    – Yes, if the signature on the cheque does not match the specimen signature provided by the account holder, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  18. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque drawn on a closed account?
    – Yes, issuing a cheque on a closed account amounts to an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  19. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to “payment stopped by drawer” reason?
    – Yes, if the drawer issues instructions to the bank to stop payment on the cheque, and it is dishonored as a result, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  20. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued by a minor?
    – No, a minor cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  21. What is the limitation period for filing an appeal against the judgment in a cheque bounce case?
    – The limitation period for filing an appeal is 30 days from the date of the judgment.
  22. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting?
    – Yes, if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  23. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque presented before the date mentioned on it?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed if a post-dated cheque is presented before the date mentioned on it.
  24. What is the difference between a civil and criminal remedy for a bounced cheque?
    – Civil remedy involves recovering the amount through a summary suit, while criminal remedy involves filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  25. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds after the re-presentation?
    – Yes, if the cheque is dishonored again due to insufficient funds upon re-presentation, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

Connect with Advocate Paresh M Modi on Google

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer, Criminal Cases

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Kalol | 9925002031 | NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Kalol Gujarat

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Kalol | 09925002031

Cheque bounce cases can create significant financial distress and legal complications for individuals and businesses alike. If you’re dealing with a bounced cheque, it’s essential to seek the expertise of a skilled lawyer who understands the nuances of cheque bounce laws. Advocate Paresh M Modi, a leading cheque bounce lawyer in Kalol, is dedicated to providing effective legal solutions to navigate these challenges. He is the Top DRT Lawyer, Best Criminal Lawyer, Experience Property Lawyer, Famous SSRD Advocate, Good Family Lawyer, Expert Divorce Lawyer and Specialist of Cheque Bounce Cases in Gujarat.

Understanding Cheque Bounce Cases

A cheque bounce occurs when a bank refuses to process a cheque due to reasons such as insufficient funds, account closure, or discrepancies in signatures. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, a bounced cheque can lead to both civil and criminal liabilities for the drawer. Therefore, it’s crucial to act quickly to protect your rights.

Our Legal Services

At our law firm, we offer a range of services tailored to handle cheque bounce cases, including:

  • Legal Consultation: Providing expert legal advice regarding your rights and responsibilities in cheque transactions and the implications of cheque bounce laws in Kalol.
  • Filing Complaints: Assisting clients in filing criminal complaints for cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  • Court Representation: Representing clients in the Kalol District Court and High Court for efficient legal proceedings.
  • Negotiation and Settlement: Working towards amicable settlements to avoid lengthy court battles.
Cheque Bounce Lawyer In Ahmedabad

NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Kalol

As a specialist in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Advocate Paresh M Modi is well-equipped to handle cases involving cheque dishonor. Under this law, a bounced cheque can result in criminal charges against the drawer. Our services related to Section 138 cases include:

  • Issuing Legal Notices: We draft and send legal notices to the issuer of the cheque, demanding payment within the legally mandated time frame.
  • Filing Section 138 Complaints: Assisting clients in filing complaints with the appropriate court to initiate legal action for cheque bounce.
  • Defending Against False Claims: If you are falsely accused of issuing a bounced cheque, we will provide a robust defense to protect your rights.
  • Court Representation: Our legal team will represent you in court, ensuring thorough preparation and effective advocacy throughout the trial process.

Why Choose Advocate Paresh M Modi?

  • Expertise in Cheque Bounce Cases: With extensive knowledge and experience, Advocate Paresh M Modi effectively manages cheque bounce cases, aiming for the best outcomes for clients.
  • Client-Centric Approach: We prioritize our clients’ needs, offering tailored legal solutions that address their specific situations.
  • Proven Track Record: Our firm has a strong history of successfully resolving cheque bounce cases, helping clients recover their rightful dues.
  • Clear Communication: We maintain transparent communication, keeping clients informed about their cases and available legal options.

The Legal Process for Cheque Bounce Cases

  1. Issuance of Legal Notice: After a cheque bounces, the first step is to issue a legal notice to the drawer, demanding payment within 15 days.
  2. Filing a Complaint: If the payment is not made, we will file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the relevant court.
  3. Court Proceedings: Our legal team will represent you in court, presenting evidence and arguments to support your case.
  4. Resolution: The court may rule in favor of the aggrieved party, allowing for the recovery of the cheque amount and potential penalties.

If you are facing a cheque bounce issue or need a NI Act Section 138 case lawyer in Kalol, it is essential to seek professional legal assistance. Contact Advocate Paresh M Modi today at 09925002031 for a consultation. Let us help you protect your rights and recover your dues efficiently.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Surat | 9925002031 | NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Surat

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Surat | 09925002031

In the world of business, cheques serve as a vital tool for transactions. However, when a cheque bounces, it can lead to significant financial repercussions and legal challenges. If you’re facing a cheque bounce issue, it’s crucial to have an experienced lawyer by your side. Advocate Paresh M Modi, a reputable cheque bounce lawyer in Surat, is here to provide you with the expert legal support you need. He is the Top DRT Lawyer, Best Criminal Lawyer, Experience Property Lawyer, Famous SSRD Advocate, Good Family Lawyer, Expert Divorce Lawyer and Specialist of Cheque Bounce Cases in Gujarat.

Understanding Cheque Bounce Cases

A cheque bounce occurs when a bank refuses to honor a cheque due to various reasons, such as insufficient funds, account closure, or discrepancies in signatures. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, a bounced cheque can result in both civil and criminal liabilities for the drawer, making it essential to address the situation promptly.

Our Legal Services

At our law firm, we specialize in providing comprehensive legal solutions for cheque bounce cases, which include:

  • Legal Consultation: Offering expert advice on your rights and obligations related to cheque transactions and cheque bounce laws in Surat.
  • Filing Complaints: Assisting clients in filing criminal complaints for cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  • Court Representation: Advocating for clients in the Surat District Court and High Court to ensure effective legal representation.
  • Negotiation and Settlement: Aiming for amicable resolutions to avoid protracted legal battles.
Cheque Bounce Lawyer In Ahmedabad

NI Act Section 138 Case Lawyer in Surat

As a specialist in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Advocate Paresh M Modi is well-versed in handling cases concerning cheque dishonor. Under this law, if a cheque is returned due to insufficient funds, the drawer can face criminal charges. Our firm offers the following services related to Section 138 cases:

  • Issuing Legal Notices: We draft and send legal notices to the cheque issuer, demanding payment within the legally stipulated time.
  • Filing Section 138 Complaints: We assist clients in filing complaints with the appropriate court to initiate legal proceedings for cheque bounce cases.
  • Defending Against False Claims: If you are wrongfully accused of issuing a bounced cheque, we will provide strong defense strategies to safeguard your rights.
  • Court Representation: Our legal team will represent you throughout the trial, ensuring thorough preparation and effective arguments in your favor.

Why Choose Advocate Paresh M Modi?

  • Expertise in Cheque Bounce Cases: With extensive knowledge and experience, Advocate Paresh M Modi effectively handles cheque bounce cases, ensuring you receive the best possible outcome.
  • Client-Centric Approach: We prioritize our clients’ needs, providing tailored legal solutions that address their unique circumstances.
  • Proven Success: Our firm has a strong track record of successfully resolving cheque bounce cases, helping clients recover their dues.
  • Transparent Communication: We maintain open lines of communication, keeping clients informed about their cases and legal options.

The Legal Process for Cheque Bounce Cases

  1. Issuance of Legal Notice: After a cheque bounces, the first step is to issue a legal notice to the drawer, demanding payment within 15 days.
  2. Filing a Complaint: If the drawer fails to make the payment, we will file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the relevant court.
  3. Court Proceedings: Our legal team will represent you in court, presenting evidence and arguments to support your case.
  4. Resolution: The court may issue a ruling in favor of the aggrieved party, allowing for recovery of the cheque amount and potential penalties.

If you are dealing with a cheque bounce issue or need an NI Act Section 138 case lawyer in Surat, it is vital to seek professional legal assistance. Contact Advocate Paresh M Modi today at 09925002031 for a consultation. Let us help you protect your rights and recover your dues efficiently.

Questions related to Cheque Bounce Case and Negotiable Instruments Act in India:

  1. What is a cheque bounce case?
    – A cheque bounce case occurs when a cheque presented for payment is dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds or any other reason.
  2. What is the legal recourse available for a bounced cheque?
    – The legal recourse available is to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
  3. What is the punishment for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
    – The punishment includes imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both.
  4. What are the essential elements to prove under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
    – The existence of a legally enforceable debt.
    – Issuance of a cheque towards discharge of debt.
    – Dishonor of the cheque.
    – The recipient of the cheque serving a legal notice demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
    – Failure of the drawer to make the payment within 15 days of receiving the notice.
  5. Is there a time limit for filing a complaint under Section 138?
    – Yes, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises.
  6. Can a cheque bounce case be settled outside of court?
    – Yes, the parties can mutually settle the matter outside of court before or after the filing of a complaint.
  7. What is the procedure for filing a complaint under Section 138?
    – The payee or holder of the cheque must issue a legal notice to the drawer demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
    – If the payment is not made within 15 days of receiving the notice, a complaint can be filed before the appropriate court having jurisdiction.
  8. Can a company file a complaint for a bounced cheque?
    – Yes, a company can file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  9. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque?
    – Yes, a cheque bounce case can be filed against a post-dated cheque if it is dishonored upon presentation.
  10. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation as it lacks consideration.
  11. Is there a provision for compoundable offenses under Section 138?
    – Yes, with the consent of the payee and the court, the offense under Section 138 can be compounded.
  12. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a stale cheque?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed against a stale cheque as it is not legally enforceable.
  13. What is the role of the court in a cheque bounce case?
    – The court examines the evidence presented by both parties and decides whether the offense under Section 138 has been committed.
  14. What defenses can be raised by the drawer in a cheque bounce case?
    – Lack of consideration.
    – Payment already made.
    – Cheque issued as security.
    – Dispute regarding the debt.
  15. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a loan repayment installment?
    – Yes, if the installment cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  16. What is the role of the bank in a cheque bounce case?
    – The bank provides the dishonor memo and other relevant documents to the payee or holder of the cheque, which are essential for filing a complaint.
  17. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to signature mismatch?
    – Yes, if the signature on the cheque does not match the specimen signature provided by the account holder, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  18. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque drawn on a closed account?
    – Yes, issuing a cheque on a closed account amounts to an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  19. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to “payment stopped by drawer” reason?
    – Yes, if the drawer issues instructions to the bank to stop payment on the cheque, and it is dishonored as a result, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  20. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued by a minor?
    – No, a minor cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  21. What is the limitation period for filing an appeal against the judgment in a cheque bounce case?
    – The limitation period for filing an appeal is 30 days from the date of the judgment.
  22. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting?
    – Yes, if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
  23. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque presented before the date mentioned on it?
    – No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed if a post-dated cheque is presented before the date mentioned on it.
  24. What is the difference between a civil and criminal remedy for a bounced cheque?
    – Civil remedy involves recovering the amount through a summary suit, while criminal remedy involves filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
  25. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds after the re-presentation?
    – Yes, if the cheque is dishonored again due to insufficient funds upon re-presentation, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

Connect with Advocate Paresh M Modi on Google

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Judgement

Judgement:

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- Section 139-Legal Liability of drawer of cheque-Presumtion under Section 139 has not been rebutted, trial Court Wrongly acquitted accused-Viewed that there was no consideration for which cheques were given to complainant-Court confirmed incorrect view, order set aside.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881- કલમ 139- ચેક કાઢી આપનારની કાનુની જવાબદારી- કલમ 139 હેઠળના અનુમાનને ખોટું ઠરાવાયું નથી-ટ્રાયલ કોર્ટે આરોપીને ખોટી રીતે છોડી મુકયો-એવો મત કે ફરિયાદીને ચેકો અપાયા જે માટે કોઇ અવેજ ન હતો-અદાલતે ખોટા અભિપ્રાયને કે મતને કાયમ કર્યો-આદેશ રદ કરવામાં આવ્યો.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 139-Liability or “debt”- Ex-pressions “give” ruising of doubt, liability under Section 138 cannot be avoided if cheque returns unpaid-High Court get carried away by issue of guarantee and guarantor’s liablity has overlooked true intent of section 138.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ 139- “જવાબદારી” અથવા “દેવું”- શબ્દપ્રયોગ શંકા પેદા કરે છે જો ચેક સ્વીકારાયા વિના પરત ફરે તો કલમ ૧૩૮ હેઠળ જવાબદારી ટાળી શકાશે નહિ-ગેંરટી આપવાથી હાઇકોર્ટ સંતોષાઇ ગઇ અને ખાત્રી આપનારની જવાબદારીને ધ્યાનમાં લીધી નથી-કલમ 138 નો ખરો ઇરાદો ધ્યાનમાં લીધો નથી.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 139- Legal liability of drawer-Limited company is a separate legal entity and its directors are different legal persons under Section 139 one can safely conclude that cheques signed had been given to company in discharge of debt or liability incurred by company.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ-139-ચેક કાઢી આપનારની કાનુની જવાબદારી-લિમિટેડ કંપની એ એક અલગ કાનુની વ્યકિતત્વ અને એના ડિરેકટરો કલમ 139 હેઠળ અલગ કાનુની વ્યકિતઓ છે- આથી એમ સલામત રીતે નિષ્કર્ષ કાઢી શકાય કે સહી કરેલો ચેક કંપનીને એના દેણા કે એણે સ્વીકારેલી જવાબદારી પ્રત્યે અપાયો હતો.

Anil Sachar v. Shree Nath Spinners Private Limited, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 799: 2011 (13) SCC 148: 2011 (3) Bank Cas 508: 2011 (8) JT 586: 2011 (3) Crimes 142: AIR 2011 SC 2751 :2011 Cri LJ 4611.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- S. 139-The standard of proof in discharge of burden in terms of S. 139, being of preponderance of probability, the inference, therefore, can be drawn not only from the materials brought on record but also from the reference to circumstances upon which the accused relied upon-Burden of proof on the accused is not as high as that of the prosecution.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881- કલમ 139- કલમ 139 ના શબ્દોમાં, બોજાની મુકિતમાં પુરાવાનું ધોરણ, શકયતાની પ્રબળતા હોવાથી રેકર્ડ પર લાવવામાં આવેલ સામગ્રી પરથી જ નહિ, પરંતુ જે સંજોગો પર આરોપીએ આધાર રાખ્યો તે સંજોગોના નિર્દેશ પરથી પણ અનુમાન કરી શકાય છે-આરોપી પર પુરવાનો બોજો ફરીયાદીના જેટલો વધારે નથી.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Section 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds in the account

Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 19 [a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless—

(a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;
(b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, 20 [within thirty days] of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and
(c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.]

138. खाते में धनराशि की अपर्याप्तता, आदि के लिए चेक का अनादर -जहां किसी व्यक्ति द्वारा किसी बैंकर के पास रखे गए खाते पर किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी भी ऋण या अन्य दायित्व के पूर्ण या आंशिक रूप से निर्वहन के लिए भुगतान करने के लिए चेक किया गया चेक है, बैंक द्वारा अवैतनिक लौटाया गया, या तो उस खाते में जमा राशि के कारण चेक का सम्मान करने के लिए अपर्याप्त है या यह उस बैंक के साथ किए गए समझौते द्वारा उस खाते से भुगतान की जाने वाली राशि से अधिक है, ऐसा व्यक्ति करेगा अपराध किया हुआ माना जाएगा और इस अधिनियम के किन्हीं अन्य प्रावधानों पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव डाले बिना, के कारावास से दंडित किया जाएगा [एक अवधि जिसे दो वर्ष तक बढ़ाया जा सकता है, या जुर्माने के साथ जो चेक की राशि से दोगुना हो सकता है, या दोनों के साथ) बशर्ते कि इस धारा में निहित कुछ भी तब तक लागू नहीं होगा जब तक कि-

(ए) चेक बैंक को उस तारीख से छह महीने(अब तीन महीने)की अवधि के भीतर प्रस्तुत किया गया है जिस पर इसे जारी गया है या इसकी वैधता की अवधि के भीतर, जो भी पहले हो;
(बी) भुगतानकर्ता या धारक चेक के उचित समय में जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के आहर्ता को लिखित रूप में नोटिस देकर उक्त राशि के भुगतान की मांग करता है, उसके भीतर बैंक से उसके द्वारा भुगतान न किए गए चेक की वापसी के संबंध में सूचना की प्राप्ति के तीस दिन; तथा
सी) ऐसे चेक का आहर्ता उक्त नोटिस की प्राप्ति के पन्द्रह दिनों के भीतर, भुगतानकर्ता या धारक को, जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के नियत समय में उक्त राशि का भुगतान करने में विफल रहता है।
स्पष्टीकरण.- इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, “ऋण या अन्य दायित्व” का अर्थ कानूनी रूप से प्रवर्तनीय ऋण या अन्य दायित्व है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.