Top Cheque bounce lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocates Ahmedabad Gujarat | Advocate Paresh M Modi
20. Inchoate stamped instruments:
where one person signs and delivers to another a paper stamped in accordance with the law relating to negotiable instruments then in force in India and either wholly blank or having written thereon an incomplete negotiable instrument, he thereby gives prima facie authority to the holder thereof to make or complete, as the case may be, upon it a negotiable instrument, for any amount specified therein and not exceeding the amount covered by the stamp. The person so signing shall be liable upon such instrument, in the capacity in which he signed the same, to any holder in due course for such amount: provided that no person other than a holder in due course shall recover from the person delivering the instrument anything in excess of the amount intended by him to be paid thereunder.
Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 338.
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Sections 20, 118(a),138, 139-Criminal Procedure code, 1973- Sections 243(2), 293-Cheque dishonored-Cheque given as security-Cheque Misused by complainant which is paid back-Section 118(a) or 139 of Act entitles to raise presumption-To Provide his evidence he must be given proper time-Accused be given opportunity to for adduce evidence in rebuttal thereof-Application filed by appellant under Section 243, Cr.P.C. he wrongly mentioned as Section 293, Cr.P.C for referring cheque in question for examination by Director, FSL for determining age of his signature-Court being master of proceedings must determine as to see whether application filed by accused in terms of Section 243(2), Cr.P.C. is bonafide or not and proposes to bring on record relevant material-Contention rejected by trial Judge and High Court considering appellant only having regard to provisions of Section 20 of Negotiable Instruments Act-By reason thereof-Accordingly instrument Subject to conditions-Application filed by appellant is bonafide-Challenged judgment is not sustainable-Therefore set aside.
Advocate Paresh M Modi is the Best Criminal Advocates well as Top Cheque Bounce Case Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Specially for NI Act Cases, Cheque Return Cases. Advocate Paresh M Modi is Practising in all Cities of Gujarat State, Specially he is working in Ahmedabad and at different areas like, Chandkheda, Sabarmati, Jawahar Chock, Keshavnagar, RTO Circle, Gandhi Ashram, Vadaj, New Vadaj, Bhimjipura, Akhbar nagar, KK nagar, Ghatlodia, Chanakyapuri, Sola, Shayona City, Naranpura, Navrangpura, Gurukul, CP nagar, Bhuyangdev, Usmanpura, Drivein, Science City, Satadhar, Memnagar, Nirnay Nagar, Chenpur, Kali Gaam, Zundal, Adalaj, IOC Road, Bhadaj Santej, Shilaj, Ambli, Bopal, Shilaj, Shela, Apple Wood, Godrej Garden City Ahmedabad, Adani Shantigram Ahmedabad, Krishna nagar, D-Cabin, Ramnagar Ahmedabad, Gujarat University, Ambawadi, Ashram Road, Income tax Circle, Nehru Bridge, Ellis Bridge, Paldi, Vasna, Shahibag, Ranip, Mithakhali, New Ranip, Dariapur, Kalupur, Shahpur, Station Road Ahmedabad, Ghee Kanta, Mirzapur Ahmedabad, Dafnala Ahmedabad, Airport Road, Sardar nagar, Kuber Nagar, Memco, Civil Hospital, Bapunagar, Gomtipur, Asarva, Prahladnagar, Makaraba, Satellite, Anand Nagar, Bodakdev, Vastrapur, Thaltej, Shilaj, Jodhpur, Ramdev nagar, Sindhu bhavan, Gota, Ognaj, Vande-Matram Circle, Tragad, Jagatpur, Motera, New CG Road, SG Road, Sarkhej, Juhapura, Kankaria, Maninagar, Ghodasar, Isanpur, Vatva, Ramol, Vastral, Odhav, Narol, Hathijan, Dehgam, Nikol, New Nikol, Naroda, New Naroda, SP Ring Road, Lambha, Aslali, GIDC Ahmedabad, Saijpur Bogha, Balol nagar,
Questions related to Cheque Bounce Case and Negotiable Instruments Act in India:
1. What is a cheque bounce case?
– A cheque bounce case occurs when a cheque presented for payment is dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds or any other reason.
2. What is the legal recourse available for a bounced cheque?
– The legal recourse available is to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
3. What is the punishment for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?**
– The punishment includes imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both.
4. What are the essential elements to prove under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
– The existence of a legally enforceable debt.
– Issuance of a cheque towards discharge of debt.
– Dishonor of the cheque.
– The recipient of the cheque serving a legal notice demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
– Failure of the drawer to make the payment within 15 days of receiving the notice.
5. Is there a time limit for filing a complaint under Section 138?
– Yes, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises.
6. Can a cheque bounce case be settled outside of court?
– Yes, the parties can mutually settle the matter outside of court before or after the filing of a complaint.
7. What is the procedure for filing a complaint under Section 138?
– The payee or holder of the cheque must issue a legal notice to the drawer demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
– If the payment is not made within 15 days of receiving the notice, a complaint can be filed before the appropriate court having jurisdiction.
8. Can a company file a complaint for a bounced cheque?
– Yes, a company can file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
9. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque?
– Yes, a cheque bounce case can be filed against a post-dated cheque if it is dishonored upon presentation.
10. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation as it lacks consideration.
11. Is there a provision for compoundable offenses under Section 138?
– Yes, with the consent of the payee and the court, the offense under Section 138 can be compounded.
12. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a stale cheque?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed against a stale cheque as it is not legally enforceable.
13. What is the role of the court in a cheque bounce case?
– The court examines the evidence presented by both parties and decides whether the offense under Section 138 has been committed.
14. What defenses can be raised by the drawer in a cheque bounce case?
– Lack of consideration.
– Payment already made.
– Cheque issued as security.
– Dispute regarding the debt.
15. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a loan repayment installment?
– Yes, if the installment cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
16. What is the role of the bank in a cheque bounce case?
– The bank provides the dishonor memo and other relevant documents to the payee or holder of the cheque, which are essential for filing a complaint.
17. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to signature mismatch?
– Yes, if the signature on the cheque does not match the specimen signature provided by the account holder, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
18. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque drawn on a closed account?
– Yes, issuing a cheque on a closed account amounts to an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
19. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to “payment stopped by drawer” reason?
– Yes, if the drawer issues instructions to the bank to stop payment on the cheque, and it is dishonored as a result, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
20. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued by a minor?
– No, a minor cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
21. What is the limitation period for filing an appeal against the judgment in a cheque bounce case?
– The limitation period for filing an appeal is 30 days from the date of the judgment.
22. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting?
– Yes, if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
23. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque presented before the date mentioned on it?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed if a post-dated cheque is presented before the date mentioned on it.
24. What is the difference between a civil and criminal remedy for a bounced cheque?
– Civil remedy involves recovering the amount through a summary suit, while criminal remedy involves filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
25. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds after the re-presentation?
– Yes, if the cheque is dishonored again due to insufficient funds upon re-presentation, a cheque bounce case can be filed.
Cheque Dishonor Lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat| 9925002031 | Top cheque Bounce Lawyers In Gujarat India
કલમ:- 20 “સ્ટેમ્પવાળું અધરું ખત”:
વટાઉખત સંબંધી ભરતમાં તે સમયે અમલમાં હોય તેવા કાયદા અનુસાર સ્ટેમ્પવાળા કાગળ તદન કોરા રાખીને અથવા તેના ઉપર અધુરું વટાઉખત લખીને કોઇ એક વ્યકિત તેના ઉપર સહી કરીને બીજી વ્યકિતનેં સોપે ત્યારે તે વ્યકિત, તેથી તે કાગળના ધારકને તેના ઉપર વધુમાં વધુ તે સ્ટેમ્પની મર્યાદામાં હોય તેટલી અને તેમાં નિર્દિષ્ટ કરેલી રકમ તે યથાપ્રસંગ વટાઉખત બનાવવાનો અથવા પુરું કરવાનો પ્રથમ દર્શેને અધિકાર આપે છે એ રીતે સહી કરનાર વ્યકિતએ જે હેસિયતમાં વ્ટાઉખત ઉપર સહી કરી હોય તે હેસિયતમાં તે વ્યકિત, તે સિવાયની કોઇપણ વ્યકિત તે ખત સોપનાર વ્યકિત પાસેથી તે ખત હેઠળ જેટલી રકમ આપવાનો તેનો ઇરાદો હોય તેથી વધુ રકમ વસુલ કરી શકશે નહિં.
Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 338.
વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881, કલમ-20, 118(એ), 138,139-ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા, 1973-કલમ-243(2),293-ચેકનો અસ્વીકાર થયો હતો-ચેક જામીનગીરી પેટે આપવામાં આવ્યો હતો- ચેકનો ફરિયાદ ધ્વારા દુરૂપયોગ કરવામાં આવેલો જેની પરત ચુકવણી કરવામાં આવી હતી-અધિનિયમની કલમ-118 (એ) અથવા 139 અનુમાન કરવા માટે હકદાર બનાવે છે-તેનો પુરાવો રજુ કરવાની તક આપવી જોઇએ-વિવાદી ધ્વારા ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા, ની કલમ-243 હેઠળ અરજી કરવામાં આવી હતી-તેણે સવાલવાળા ચેકની ચકાસણી માટે નિર્દેશક, એફ.એસ.એલ. ને સહીના સમયગાળો નક્કી કરવાના હેતુસર માટે મોકલવા બાબતની અરજીમાં ભુલથી ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા ની કલમ-293 નો ઉલ્લેખ કર્યો હતો- અદાલત કાર્યવાહીની નિષ્ણાત હોવાથી તેણે એ જોઇને નકકી કરવું ફરજીયાત છે કે શું આરોપી ધ્વારા ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા ની કલમ 243(2) હેઠળ કરવામાં આવેલ અરજી શુધ્ધબુધ્ધિ પુર્વકની છે કે નહી અને તે સંબંધીત સામગ્રીને રેકોર્ડ પર લાવવા માંગે છે-મુકદમા ન્યાયાધીશે વિવાદ નામંજુર કરેલો અને વિવાદ અરજીને માત્ર વટાઉખત અધિનિયમની કલમ-20 હેઠળની જોગવાઇઓ પુરતી જ ધ્યાને લીધેલી-જેના કારણોસર તે કરવામાં આવી હતી-તે પ્રમાણે વટાઉખત શરતોને આધીન છે-વિવાદી ધ્વારા કરવામાં આવેલ અરજી શુધ્ધબુધ્ધિ પુર્વકની છે-પડકારવામાં આવેલ ચુકાદો ટકવાપાત્ર નથી-તેણી તેને રદ કરવામાં આવ્યો.
Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031
अहमदाबाद में चेक बाउंस वकील | 9925002031
અમદાવાદમાં ચેક બાઉન્સ વકીલ | 9925002031
আহমেদাবাদে চেক বাউন্স আইনজীবী | 9925002031
अहमदाबादमधील चेक बाऊन्स वकील | 9925002031
అహ్మదాబాద్లో చెక్ బౌన్స్ లాయర్ | 9925002031
அகமதாபாத்தில் செக் பவுன்ஸ் வழக்கறிஞர் | 9925002031
ಅಹಮದಾಬಾದ್ನಲ್ಲಿ ಚೆಕ್ ಬೌನ್ಸ್ ವಕೀಲರು | 9925002031
Advocate Paresh M Modi, Ahmedabad Gujarat is the Top Cheque Bounce Case Lawyer in Ahmedabad. he has a team of Best Cheque Return Advocates in Ahmedabad, At any stage of the cheque return case, he may change the case in your favour. Advocate Paresh M Modi is taking care of Criminal Cases, Cheque Bounce Cases, Family Matters, Civil Matters and Property Disputes, Call Or WhatsApp SMS on Mobile No. 9925002031 to book the Appointment of him.
If you want to know the basic details of the above subject, you may find the 3-4 minutes you tube video of Advocate Paresh M Modi by clicking the given link below,
