Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 125 : The Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973

Section 125. Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents.-

(1) If any person having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain-

(a) his wife, unable to maintain herself, or

(b) his legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain itself, or

(c) his legitimate or illegitimate child (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself, or

(d) his father or mother, unable to maintain himself or herself, a Magistrate of the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate not exceeding five hundred rupees in the whole, as such Magistrate thinks fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct: Provided that the Magistrate may order the father of a minor female child referred to in clause (b) to make such allowance, until she attains her majority, if the Magistrate is satisfied that the husband of such minor female child, if married, is not possessed of sufficient means. Explanation – For the purposes of this Chapter,-

(a) “minor” means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875 ); is deemed not to have attained his majority;

(b) “wife” includes a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried.

(2) Such allowance shall be payable from the date of the order, or, if so ordered, from the date of the application for maintenance.

(3) If any person so ordered fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order, any such Magistrate may, for every breach of the order, issue a warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines, and may sentence such person, for the whole or any part of each month’ s allowances remaining unpaid after the execution of the warrant, to imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until payment if sooner made: Provided that no warrant shall be issued for the recovery of any amount due under this section unless application be made to the Court to levy such amount within a period of one year from the date on which it became due:

Provided further that if such person offers to maintain his wife on condition of her living with him, and she refuses to live with him, such Magistrate may consider any grounds of refusal stated by her, and may make an order under this section notwithstanding such offer, if he is satisfied that there is just ground for so doing.

Explanation.- If a husband has contracted marriage with another woman or keeps a mistress, it shall be considered to be just ground for his wife’ s refusal to live with him.

(4) No Wife shall be entitled to receive an allowance from her husband under this section if she is living in adultery, or if, without any sufficient reason, she refuses to live with her husband, or if they are living separately by mutual consent.

(5) On proof that any wife in whose favour an order has been made under this section is living in adultery, or that without sufficient reason she refuses to live with her husband, or that they are living separately by mutual consent.

धारा 125 पत्नियों, बच्चों और माता-पिता के भरण-पोषण का आदेश।

(1) यदि पर्याप्त साधनों वाला कोई व्यक्ति –

(क) अपनी पत्नी का, जो अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है, या

(ख) अपनी धर्मज या अधर्मज अवयस्क संतार का, चाहे विवाहित हो न हो, जो अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है, या

(ग) अपनी धर्मज या अधर्मज संतान का (जो विवाहित पुत्री नहीं है) जिसने वयस्कता प्राप्त कर ली है, जहंा ऐसी संतान किसी शरीरिक या मानसिक असामान्यता या क्षति के कारण अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है, या

(घ) अपने पिता या माता का, जो अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है,भरणपोषण करने में उपेक्षा करता है या भरणपोषण करने से इंकार करता है तो प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट, ऐसी उपेक्षा या इंकार के साबित हो जाने पर, ऐसे व्यक्ति को यह निदेश दे सकता है कि वह अपनी पत्नी या ऐसी संतान, पिता या माता के भरणपोषण के लिए ऐसी मासिक दर पर, जिसे मजिस्ट्रेट ठीक समझे, मासिक भत्ता दे और उस भत्ते का संदाय ऐसे व्यक्ति को करे जिसको संदाय करने का मजिस्ट्रेट समय पर निर्देश दे:

परंतु मजिस्ट्रेट खण्ड (ख) निर्दिष्ट अवयस्क पुत्री के पिता को ऐसा भत्ता दे जब तक वह वयस्क नहीं हो जाती है यदि मजिस्ट्रेट का समाधान हो जाता है कि ऐसी अवयस्क पुत्री के, यदि वह विवाहित हो, पति के पास पर्याप्त साधन नहीं है।

परंतु यह और कि इस उपधारा के अधीन मासिक भत्ते से संबंधित भरण-पोषण की कार्यवाही के दौरान मजिस्ट्रेट ऐसे व्यक्ति को आदेश दे सकता है कि वह अपनी पत्नी या ऐसी संतान, पिता या माता, को अंतरिम भरण-पोषण और ऐसी कार्यवाही के खर्चे, का मासिक भत्ता दे जिसे मजिस्ट्रेट उचित समझे और उसका संदाय ऐसे व्यक्ति को करे जिसके लिए वह समय≤ पर निर्देश दे।

परंतु यह और भी कि इस द्वितीय परंतुक के अधीन अंतरिम भरण-पोषण और कार्यवाही के खर्चे का मासिक भत्ता के लिए का आवेदन को यथा सम्भव आवेदन की सूचना ऐसे व्यक्ति पर तामील से 60 दिन में निपटा दिया जाय।

स्पष्टीकरण – इस अध्याय के प्रयोजनों के लिए –

(क) ‘अवयस्क’ से ऐसा व्यक्ति अभिप्रेत है जिसके बारे में भारतीय वयस्कता अधिनियम, 1875 (1875 का 9) के उपबंधों के अधीन यह समझा जाता है कि उसने व्यस्कता प्राप्त नहीं की है।

(ख) ‘पत्नी’ के अंतर्गत ऐसी स्त्री भी है जिसके पति ने उससे विवाह-विच्छेद कर लिया है जिसने अपने पति से विवार-विच्छेद कर लिया है और जिसने पुनर्विवाह नही किया है।

(2) भरण-पोषण या अंतरिम भरण-पोषण के लिए ऐसा कोई भत्ता या कार्यवाही के खर्चे आदेश की तारीख से, या यदि ऐसा आदेश दिया जाता है तो भरण-पोषण या अंतरिम भरण-पोषण और कार्यवाही के खर्चे, जैसी भी स्थिति हो आवेदन की तारीख से संदेय होगा।

(3) यदि कोई व्यक्ति जिसे आदेश दिया गया हो, उस आदेश का अनुपालन करने में पर्याप्त कारण के बिना असफल रहता है तो उस आदेश के प्रत्येक भंग के लिए ऐसा कोई मजिस्ट्रेट देय रकम के ऐसी रीति से उदगृहीत किए जाने के लिए वारण्ट जारी कर सकता है जैसी रीति जुर्माने उदगृहीत करने के लिए उपबंधित है और उस वारण्ट के निष्पादन के पश्चात प्रत्येक मास के न चुकाए गए भरण-पोषण या अंतरिम भरण-पोषण का भत्ता और कार्यवाही के खर्चे जैसी भी स्थिति हो या उसके किसी भाग के लिए ऐसे व्यक्ति को एक मास तक की अवधि के लिए अथवा यदि वह उससे पूर्व चुका दिया जाता है तो चुका देने के समय तक के लिए कारावास का दण्डादेश दे सकता है परंतु इस धारा के अधीन देय किसी रकम की वसूली के लिए कोई वारण्ट तब तक जारी न किया जाएगा जब तक उस रकम को उदगृहीत करने के लिए, उस तारीख से जिसको वह देय हुई एक वर्ष की अवधि के अंदर न्यायालय से आवेदन नहीं किया गया है:

परंतु यह और कि यदि ऐसा व्यक्ति इस शर्त पर भरणपोषण करने की प्रस्थापना करता है कि उसकी पत्नी उसके साथ रहे और वह पति के साथ रहने से इंकार करती है तो ऐसा मजिस्ट्रेट उसके द्वारा कथित इंकार के किन्हीं आधारों पर विचार कर सकता है और ऐसी प्रस्थापना के किए जाने पर भी वह इस धारा के अधीन आदेश दे सकता है यदि उसका सामाधान हो जाता है कि ऐसा आदेश देने के लिए न्यायसंगत आधार है।

स्पष्टीकरण – यदि पति ने अन्य स्त्री से विवाह कर लिया है या वह रखेल रखता है तो यह उसकी पत्नी द्वारा उसके साथ रहने से इंकार का न्यायसंगत आधार माना जाएगा।

(4) कोई पत्नी अपने पति से इस धारा के अधीन भरण-पोषण का भत्ता और कार्यवाही के खर्चे के जैसी भी स्थिति हो प्राप्त करने की हकदार न होगी यदि वह जारता की दशा में रह रही है अथवा यदि वह पर्याप्त कारण के बिना अपने पति के साथ रहने से इंकार करती है अथवा यदि वे पारस्परिक सम्मति से पृथक रह रहे है।

(5) मजिस्ट्रेट यह साबित होने पर आदेश को रदद कर सकता है कि कोई पत्नी, जिसके पक्ष में इस धारा के अधीन आदेश दिया गया है जारता की दशा में रह रही है अथवा पर्याप्त कारण के बिना अपने पति के साथ रहने से इंकार करती है अथवा वे पारस्परिक सम्मति से पृथक रह रहे है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer, Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 : Section 141

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Liability of vicarious na-ture-Burden of proof lies on appellant-Onus has to be discharged by good evidence, High Court committed error in discharging liability-Whether or not they were partners in firm is a fact, to be established in trial-Initial burden by way of averment has been made by appellant.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – પ્રતિનિધક સ્વરૂપની જવાબદારી-અપીલકર્તા પર પુરાવાનો બોજો પડે છે-સારા પુરાવાથી ભાર ઉતારવાનો છે-જવાબદારી રદ કરવામાં હાઇકોર્ટ ભુલ કરી છે-તેઓ પેઢીમાં ભાગીદાર હતા કે નહિ તે એક હકીકત છે-જે ટ્રાયલમાં પુરવાર કરવાની છે-ખાતરીપૂર્વક બોલવાથી શરૂનો બોજો અપીલકર્તા પર છે.

Judgement

Rallis India Ltd v.Poduru Vidya Bhusan, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 778: 2011 (13) SCC 88: 2011 (3) Supreme 244:2011 (2) Crimes (SC) 177 :2011 (1) Bankmann 617.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Criminal liability attracted-If accused is able to prove to satisfaction of Court that offence was commited without his Knowledge or he has exercised diligence to prove commission of of-fence he will not be liable to be punished-final judgment would depend on evidence adduced.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – કંપનીનો નોન-એકિઝ્કયુટિવ ડિરેકટર-ડિરેકટરની ફરિયાદ કે તેણી ડિરેકટર તરીકે બંધ થઇ ગઇ હોવા છતાં તેને આરોપી તરીકે બોલવવામાં આવે છે-ફરિયાદીએ જુની તારીખના જવાબને ધ્યાનમાં ન લીધો-કાયદાકીય નોટિસમાં એવી સ્પષ્ટ માહિતી સમાવિષ્ટ છે કે તેણીએ એક દિવસ પહેલાં જ રાજીનામું આપ્યું હતું.

Anita Malhotra v. Apparel Export Promotion Council, AIR 2012 SC 31:2012 (1) SCC 520:2011 (8) Supreme 1: 2012 CrLJ 625:2011 (12) JT 550:2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 496:2011 (4) Crimes (SC) 281:2011 (2) Bankmann 504.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Non executive Directors of Company-Girevance of Director that in Spite of assertion that she ceased to be a Director she was arrayed as accused-Complainant did not refer to reply on old date-Reply to statutory notice contains specific information that she had resigned be gone back.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – ડાયરેકટરની જવાબદારી-ડાયરેકટરનું રાજીનામું કંપની દ્રારા સ્વીકારાયુ-તેના રાજીનામા સ્વીકાર્યા બાદના વ્યવહાર માટે તે જવાબદાર નથી-શબ્દ ‘કોઇપણ વ્યકિત’-ગુનો થયો ત્યારે તે તારીખે જે વ્યકિત હોય તે જવાબદાર.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 29 : The Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973

Section 29. Sentences which Magistrates may pass.

(1) The Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.

(2) The Court of a Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or of both.

(3) The Court of a Magistrate of the second class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or of fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or of both.

(4) The Court of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall have the powers of the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate and that of a Metropolitan Magistrate, the powers of the Court of a Magistrate of the first class.

धारा 29 – दण्डादेश, जो मजिस्ट्रेट दे सकेंगे —

(1) मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय मृत्यु या आजीवन कारावास या सात वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि के लिए कारावास के दण्डादेश के सिवाय कोई ऐसा दण्डादेश दे सकता है जो विधि द्वारा प्राधिकृत है।

(2) प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय तीन वर्ष से अनधिक अवधि के लिए कारावास का या दस हजार रुपए से अनधिक जुर्माने का, या दोनों का, दण्डादेश दे सकता है ।

(3) द्वितीय वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय एक वर्ष से अनधिक अवधि के लिए कारावास का या पाँच हजार रुपए से अनधिक जुर्माने का, या दोनों का, दण्डादेश दे सकता है।

(4) मुख्य महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय को मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय की शक्तियाँ और महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय को प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट की शक्तियाँ होंगी।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section-6 : The Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973

Section-6 Classes of Criminal Courts. – Besides the High Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than this Code, there shall be, in every State, the following classes of Criminal Courts, namely;

  1. Courts of Session;
  2. Judicial Magistrate of the first class and, in any Metropolitan area, Metropolitan Magistrate;
  3. Judicial Magistrate of the second class; and
  4. Executive Magistrates.

धारा 6 -दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता – उच्च न्यायालयों और इस संहिता से भिन्न किसी विधि के अधीन गठित न्यायालयों के अतिरिक्त, प्रत्येक राज्य में निम्नलिखित वर्गों के दण्ड न्यायालय होंगे अर्थात-

  1. सेशन न्यायालय
  2. प्रथम वर्ग न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट और किसी महानगर क्षेत्र में महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट
  3. द्वितीय वर्ग न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट और
  4. कार्यपालक मजिस्ट्रेट

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

301. Culpable homicide by causing death of person other than person whose death was intended.—If a person, by doing anything which he intends or knows to be likely to cause death, commits culpable homicide by causing the death of any person, whose death he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause, the culpable homicide committed by the offender is of the description of which it would have been if he had caused the death of the person whose death he intended or knew himself to be likely to cause.

301 IPC जिस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का इरादा था, उसके अलावा किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की मृत्यु कारित करके गैर इरादतन हत्या।

यदि कोई व्यक्ति ऐसा कुछ भी करता है जिसका वह इरादा करता है या जानता है कि मृत्यु का कारण बनना संभव है, किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता है, जिसकी मृत्यु का न तो वह इरादा रखता है और न ही खुद को होने की संभावना जानता है। अपराधी का वह विवरण है जिसके बारे में यह होता यदि वह उस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता जिसकी मृत्यु का वह इरादा रखता था या खुद जानता था कि ऐसा करना संभव है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.