Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section-138 Judgement

Narsingbhai Jethabhai Aakoliya Vs. State of Gujarat 2019 (1) G.L.H.234.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-S.138 and S. 139-Dishonour of Cheque-Presumption-The onus to rebut the presumption that the Cheque has been issued in discharge of a debt or liability is on the accused-The fact that the cheque might be post dated does not absolve the drawer of the cheque of the penal consequences under the Act.

Narsingbhai Jethabhai Aakoliya Vs. State of Gujarat 2019 (1) G.L.H.234.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881-કલમ 138 અને કલમ 139 -ચેક પરત ફર્યા- ધારણા-દેવું અથવા જવાબદારીમાંથી મુકત થવા ચેક આપવામાં આવ્યો છે, તે ધારણનું ખંડન કરવાનો બોજો આરોપી પર છે-હકીકત છે કે, પછીની તારીખનો ચેક કદાચ ચેક લખનારને કાયદા હેઠળ દંડના પરિણામોથી આરોપમુકત કરી શકતું નથી.

Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H.338.

Negotiable Instruments Act,1881-S. 138-A complaint u/S. 138 is filed and it is settled between the parties-A fresh cheque is issued as per the terms of settlement and the same is dishonoured-Held, Only signatory of the cheque is responsible if the cheque is issued from his personal account-It is open for the complainant to challenge the order of acquittal passed in pursuance of the settle-ment against all the persons who were signatories of the settlement.

Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H.338.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881- કલમ 138 કલમ 138 હેઠળ ફરિયાદ દાખલ કરવામાં આવી અને પક્ષો વચ્ચે સમાધાનની શરતો અનુસાર નવો ચેક જારી કરવામાં આવ્યો અને તે પરત ફરેલ- ઠરાવ્યું, જો ચેક તેના વ્યકિતગત ખાતામાંથી આપવામાં આવેલ હોય તો માત્ર ચેક પર હસ્તાક્ષ્ર કરનાર જવાબદાર છે- ફરિયાદ કરનાર સમાધાનમાં હસ્તાક્ષ્રર કરનાર તમામ વ્યક્તિઓ સામે સમાધાનના અનુસંધાનમાં નિર્દોષ છોડવાના આદેશને પડકારી શકે છે.

Garnet Speciality Paper Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat 2019 (1) G.L.H. 543.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-S. 138- The accused convicted for the offenses u/S. 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act to undergo sentence of simple imprisonment for one year-After conviction the accused deposited an amount of cheque of Rs.2 lacs, which was challenged by the complainant in the High Court contending that even amount of interest is also denied with the Trial Court-The High Court while allowing appeal directly to pay twice the amount of the cheque to the original complainant by way of fine which shall be deposited by the convict with the High Court within a period of 12 weeks from the date of the order, failing which the respondent convict shall pay interest on the said sum at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of complaint-The complainanat will be entited to receive such amount on deposit by the convict- if the convict fails to deposit the said amount, the trial court shall issue warrant against the convict directing them to serve sentence of simple imprisonment for 6 months u/S. 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.

Garnet Speciality Paper Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat 2019 (1) G.L.H. 543.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881-કલમ 138 આરોપીને વટાવખત અધિનિયમની કલમ 138 હેઠળના ગુના માટે એક વર્ષની સાદી કેદની સજા કરવામાં આવેલ-સજા કર્યા બાદ આરોપીએ રૂ. 2/- લાખની એક રકમનો ચેક જમા કરાવેલ, કે જે ફરિયાદીએ હાઇકોર્ટ સમક્ષ એવું દર્શાવી પડકારેલ કે ઇંસાફી અદાલત સમક્ષ વ્યાજની રકમ માટે પણ નકારેલ છે જયારે નામદાર હાઇકોર્ટ અરજી દાખલ કરતા સમયે સીધી સુચના આપેલ કે મુળ ફરિયાદીને ચેકની રકમ કરતા બે ગણી રકમ દંડ તરીકે કે જે ગુન્હેગાર દ્રારા હાઇકોર્ટ સમક્ષ હુકમની તારીખથી 12 અઠવાડિયાના એક સમયમાં જમા કરાવે, જેમાં નિષ્ફળ થતાં પ્રતિવાદી ગુંહેગારે વાર્ષિક 9% લેખેની રકમ ફરિયાદની તારીખથી જમા કરાવે-ફરિયાદી આવી રકમ જમા કરાવવામાં નિષ્ફળ રહેશે, તો ઇન્સાફી અદાલત સજા પામનાર સામે પરક્રામ્ય લેખોના અધિનિયમની કલમ 138 હેઠળ છ માસની સાદી કેદની સજા ભોગવવાની તેમને સજાની સુચનાનું વોરંટ જારી કરી શકશે.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section 138 Judgement

Section 138:- Judgement

The Peoples Co-operative Credit Society Limited, Thro.’ Manager Vs. Modi Chandrikaben Harnesh Kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 246.

Negotiable instruments Act, 1881-S. 138-Summons triable case based on private complaint filed u/S. 138-Magistrate issued summons u/S.204 of Cr.P.C., recorded plea and followed regular procedure including examination of wit-nesses and adopted summons trial-Appellate Court remanded case to traial court relying upon judgement delivered in case of Nitinbhai Sevantilal Shah-Held, parties are allowed to lead evidence and examine witness-Appellate Court erred in applying ratio of the case in summons triable case.

Section 138:- Judgement

The Peoples Co-operative Credit Society Limited, Thro.’ Manager Vs. Modi Chandrikaben Harnesh Kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 246.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881-કલમ 138- કલમ 138 હેઠળ સમંસોની કાર્યવાહી બાબત ઉપર ખાનગી ફરિયાદ દાખલ કરેલ- ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતિ સંહિતાની કલમ 204 – હેઠળ- મેજીસ્ટ્રેટે સમન્સો આપેલ, દલીલ નોંધેલ અને સાક્ષીઓને તપાસવા સહિતની નિયમિત કાર્યવાહીને અનુસરેલ અને સમંસોની ઇંસાફી કાર્યવાહી સ્વીકારેલ – નીતિનભાઇ સેવંતીલાલ શાહના કેસના ચુકાદા ઉપર આધાર રાખીને અપીલ અદાલતને કેસ પરત મોકલેલ- ઠરાવ્યુંં પક્ષકારોને પુરાવા રજૂ કરવા અને સાક્ષીઓને તપાસવા મંજુરી આપવામાં આવે છે- અપીલ અદાલતે સમંસોના ઇંસાફી કેસમાં કેસના ગુણોતર લાગુ પાડવામાં ભૂલ કરેલ છે.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section 138 Judgement

Section:138 : Comment :

Negotiable Insturments Act, 1881-Complaint u/S. 138-Specifies that all the accused in active connivance mischievously and intentionally issued the cheques in favour of the applellant-No unimpeachable evidence brought on record to indicate that allowing the proceedings to continue would be an abuse of process of the Court-Appeals allowed orders of quashment by the Hon’ble High Court of judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and state of Andhra pradesh is set aside and that of the Trial Court is restored.

ટીપ્પણી:

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881- કલમ 138 હેઠળ ફરિયાદ-સુચવે છે કે તમામ આરોપીઓ સક્રિય સંમતિથી અપરાધપુર્વક અને ઇરાદાપુર્વક અરજદારની તરફેણમાં ચેક જારી કર્યા હતા- કાર્યવાહી ચાલુ રાખવી એ અદાલતની પ્રક્રિયાનો દુરપયોગ સુચવવા માટે કોઇ બિન-તહોમતપત્ર પુરાવા રેકોર્ડ પર લાવાય નથી- તેલાંગણ રાજય અને આંધ્ર પ્રદેશ રાજય માટે હૈદરાબાદમાં ન્યાયિક માનનીય હાઇકોર્ટ દ્રારા આપવામાં આવેલ રદ બાતલનો હુકમ રદ કરવામાં આવે છે અને તેમાં સુનાવણી અદાલતનો હુકમ પુન:સ્થાપિત કરવામાં આવ્યો અને અપીલો મંજુર કરવામાં આવી.

Section:138: Judgement

A.R.Radha Krishna Vs. Dasari Deepthi 2019 (1) G.L.H. 674.

Negotiable Insturuments Act, 1881-S.138-Husband of accused-Secured loan-wife of loanee issued cheque bounced-Statutory notice served-Complaint-Conclusion of trial-Trial Court acquitted accused-No privity of contract is between complainant Bank and husband of accused-Not joined as co-accused-No liability been fastened upon accused-Acquittal confirm-Appeal dismissed.

Section:138: Judgement

A.R.Radha Krishna Vs. Dasari Deepthi 2019 (1) G.L.H. 674.

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, 1881- કલમ-૧૩૮- આરોપીનો પતિ-લોન/રૂણ મેળવેલ- લોન લેનારની પત્નીએ આપેલ ચેક પરત ફરેલ -કાયદેસરની નોટીસ આપવામાં આપેલ-ફરિયાદ- સુનાવણીનો અંત- ઇન્સાફી અદાલતે આરોપીને નિર્દોષ છોડેલ- પક્ષકારો વચ્ચે કરાર સંબંધ નથી- ઠરાવ્યું, ફરિયાદી બેંક અને આરોપીના પતિ વચ્ચે કરાર સંબંધ છે-સહાઆરોપી તરીકે જોડાયેલ નથી-આરોપી ઉપર જવાબદારી લાદી શકાય નહિ- નિર્દોષ છોડવાના હુકમ મંજુર કરવા આવ્યો-(અપીલ) નામંજુર કરવામાં આવી.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Section 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds in the account

Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 19 [a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless—

(a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;
(b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, 20 [within thirty days] of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and
(c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.]

138. खाते में धनराशि की अपर्याप्तता, आदि के लिए चेक का अनादर -जहां किसी व्यक्ति द्वारा किसी बैंकर के पास रखे गए खाते पर किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को किसी भी ऋण या अन्य दायित्व के पूर्ण या आंशिक रूप से निर्वहन के लिए भुगतान करने के लिए चेक किया गया चेक है, बैंक द्वारा अवैतनिक लौटाया गया, या तो उस खाते में जमा राशि के कारण चेक का सम्मान करने के लिए अपर्याप्त है या यह उस बैंक के साथ किए गए समझौते द्वारा उस खाते से भुगतान की जाने वाली राशि से अधिक है, ऐसा व्यक्ति करेगा अपराध किया हुआ माना जाएगा और इस अधिनियम के किन्हीं अन्य प्रावधानों पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव डाले बिना, के कारावास से दंडित किया जाएगा [एक अवधि जिसे दो वर्ष तक बढ़ाया जा सकता है, या जुर्माने के साथ जो चेक की राशि से दोगुना हो सकता है, या दोनों के साथ) बशर्ते कि इस धारा में निहित कुछ भी तब तक लागू नहीं होगा जब तक कि-

(ए) चेक बैंक को उस तारीख से छह महीने(अब तीन महीने)की अवधि के भीतर प्रस्तुत किया गया है जिस पर इसे जारी गया है या इसकी वैधता की अवधि के भीतर, जो भी पहले हो;
(बी) भुगतानकर्ता या धारक चेक के उचित समय में जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के आहर्ता को लिखित रूप में नोटिस देकर उक्त राशि के भुगतान की मांग करता है, उसके भीतर बैंक से उसके द्वारा भुगतान न किए गए चेक की वापसी के संबंध में सूचना की प्राप्ति के तीस दिन; तथा
सी) ऐसे चेक का आहर्ता उक्त नोटिस की प्राप्ति के पन्द्रह दिनों के भीतर, भुगतानकर्ता या धारक को, जैसा भी मामला हो, चेक के नियत समय में उक्त राशि का भुगतान करने में विफल रहता है।
स्पष्टीकरण.- इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, “ऋण या अन्य दायित्व” का अर्थ कानूनी रूप से प्रवर्तनीय ऋण या अन्य दायित्व है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Understanding Cheque Bounce Cases and the Role of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocate in Ahmedabad | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Cheque Bounce Lawyer:

A Cheque Bounce Lawyer is a legal professional who specializes in Cheque Bounce cases. Cheque Bounce is a criminal offense in India, and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, governs the legal aspects of Cheque Bounce cases. A Cheque Bounce Lawyer can assist you in understanding the legal implications of Cheque Bounce, and the options available to you.

If you are a victim of Cheque Bounce, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you file a Cheque Bounce case against the issuer of the cheque. They can represent you in court proceedings and help you recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

If you have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you defend yourself in court. They can advise you on the legal options available to you and represent you in court proceedings. They can also help you negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

Cheque Bounce cases:

Cheque Bounce cases are initiated by the payee against the issuer of a bounced cheque. The payee must prove that they had a legally enforceable debt or liability against the issuer of the cheque, and that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account or any other reason.

The payee can file a Cheque Bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for criminal liability in case of Cheque Bounce. The case can be filed in the court where the cheque was dishonored or where the payee has a registered office.

If the court finds the issuer guilty of issuing a bounced cheque, they may order them to pay the amount due along with any penalty and interest. The court may also impose imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both.

It’s important to note that Cheque Bounce cases can be time-consuming and expensive, and may require the assistance of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer. Therefore, it’s advisable to take appropriate measures to ensure that cheques issued or received by you are honored by the bank.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a well-known Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. He has extensive experience in handling Cheque Bounce cases and has represented clients in various courts across Gujarat.

Advocate Modi provides legal services related to all aspects of Cheque Bounce cases, including legal consultation, drafting of legal notices, filing of Cheque Bounce cases, and representation in court proceedings. He has a track record of successfully handling Cheque Bounce cases and helping clients recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

Advocate Modi also assists clients who have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque. He provides legal advice and representation in court proceedings, and helps clients negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

If you are facing a Cheque Bounce issue in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and are in need of legal assistance, you can reach out to Advocate Paresh M Modi for expert guidance and representation.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
1 … 4 5 6